Monday, April 11, 2011

Memory

A Poem by Tim Holloway

Memory – by Tim Holloway
Our memory is like a burning scrap of paper,
we use it to light up the past.

*

Once upon a time there were people
that weren’t very good at thinking.
To them, everything old was sacred.
Priests made sure that no son did anything
that his father had not done before him.

**

They lived in cities and towns,
buried from time to time by the desert sands.
The land turned year by year like a potter’s wheel.
They would eventually become the greatest inventors of all time.

***

Have you ever stood between two mirrors?
Even when you can’t see the mirrors in their reflections anymore,
they are still there, and you know it.
Like the past, they continue on, becoming the future.

**

And behind every ‘Once upon a time…’ there is another.
For some reason the ego needs a past to spring from,
or it would suffer and crumble into dust.

*

Our memory is like a burning scrap of paper,
we use it to light up the past.

Contributor's Note: This is my sixth foray into online education at Cerro Coso - the first being a pair of computer classes - followed by Philosophy, Ethics, Music, Film Studies, Anthropology, Archeology, Theater, E-Commerce, and Creative Writing courses. It has been an experience that I highly recommend. I’m slowly whittling away at completing the required courses towards acquiring an AA degree - of one form or another - and having these classes available online is priceless.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Nine in Time

A Poem by Tim Holloway

She lay in repose
on the frost nipped lawn,
Jagged, sharp teeth bared in the grimace
of her last thoughts.
Her silver hair reflects the iciness
of the scene.
Her fur coat stiff; breathlessness
claims what once ran wild.
Carefully, awkwardly, I collect her
and then place her to rest rigidly with my discards.
Many mice will dance tonite.

Contributor's Note: This is my sixth foray into online education at Cerro Coso - the first being a pair of computer classes - followed by Philosophy, Ethics, Music, Film Studies, Anthropology, Archeology, Theater, E-Commerce, and Creative Writing courses. It has been an experience that I highly recommend. I’m slowly whittling away at completing the required courses towards acquiring an AA degree - of one form or another - and having these classes available online is priceless.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Memory

A Poem by Tim Holloway

Memory is like
a burning scrap of paper
lighting up the past.

Contributor's Note: This is my sixth foray into online education at Cerro Coso - the first being a pair of computer classes - followed by Philosophy, Ethics, Music, Film Studies, Anthropology, Archeology, Theater, E-Commerce, and Creative Writing courses. It has been an experience that I highly recommend. I’m slowly whittling away at completing the required courses towards acquiring an AA degree - of one form or another - and having these classes available online is priceless.

Monday, February 07, 2011

Sunset Boulevard Villanelle

A Poem by Angie Wilson

A bag lady leans against a palm tree
At the corner of Sunset and Gower,
Smashing cans with a broken chunk of concrete.

Her face has aged twenty years past the dreams
That brought her here. At the heart of rush hour,
A bag lady leans against a palm tree.

At Van Ness sits a double amputee
In his chair by the KTLA tower,
Smashing cans with a broken chunk of concrete.

An impeccably dressed studio flunky
Looks in a rush but pauses to glower.
A bag lady leans against a palm tree,

Singing, strumming, and stinking of Chablis.
Dream big but don’t wind up on a corner
Smashing cans with a broken chunk of concrete.

It’s a short walk from the Grove to gritty
And they keep the doors locked at Sunset Gower.
A bag lady leans against a palm tree
Smashing cans with a broken chunk of concrete.

Contributor's Note: After fifteen years of sporadic study at four community colleges, I accidentally earned an A.A. in Social Sciences from Cerro Coso and now I occasionally take a class for fun. I'm a city girl living in a small town, a beach bum marooned in the desert, a pacifist working on a Navy base.

Monday, January 31, 2011

The Mountaineer

Short Story by William Barclay

When they checked into the hotel, Carolyn remembered something strange. A year ago, probably to the day, they had been in France. There were no problems then with the lavatories or with airport security. They had each brought a single bag. It was a group vacation, one of those organized tours, and they had been surrounded by strangers who talked over everything and laughed raucously at secret jokes. Steven hated the tour guides, hated walking around in a herd and being told where to look. He wanted to see great art and had no interest in street performers or the clever boutiques at the Palais Royal. They separated from the group; they spent hours looking at Caravaggios; they made love the day before they came home. It was pleasing in a comfortable and entirely familiar way, the way their friends’ vacations were pleasing. And now, a year later, this.

There was no accounting for life. She had learned that much, and yet Carolyn was still prepared. While they waited for the elevator, trailed by a bellman hauling their collection of trunks, she inspected the list of names and phone numbers, the precisely choreographed itinerary, the new dosing schedule. She managed her existence this way, writing everything down on checklists and color-coded index cards held together by rubber bands. She was no longer herself; she was the thing on those papers; she was the next thing.

In their room, plain but decent and overlooking a narrow, tree-lined courtyard, she helped Steven into the bathroom and onto the toilet. She took a dampened washcloth to his face, being careful not to rile the sore that had appeared on his chin. She brushed his teeth. While Carolyn brewed his coffee—decaf, not that it mattered, not that he would actually drink it—she inspected the brochures fanned out along the table in the kitchenette. They were provided by companies that sold hiking equipment and offered rafting trips for outdoorsmen and their families. Sun River, she was reminded, offered you the time of your life.

Armed with his coffee, Steven worked some more on his letter to the family. It was his opus, composed over the course of months using a device that translated his speaking voice into large blocks of text on a laptop computer. It was a stupid machine. It put contractions where whole words should have been; it didn’t know the difference between “am” and “an”. His words were punctuated by long pauses, by neck spasms and short, sudden gasps for air. A couple of times, when the machine went haywire or he forgot where he left off, he glanced over at Carolyn and widened his eyes comically. This was his wink, his shrug. They could still laugh, couldn’t they?

Soon he drifted off. He was sleeping more and more lately. Whether it was the drugs or the stress or the gradual diminution of his body no one knew. He could sit there for hours, twelve or fourteen at a time, waking only to chew on muscle relaxants or sip water through a straw. Carolyn usually read a book. This time she decided to go for a walk, although she wasn’t entirely sure why. Air seemed like a good idea, fresh air, and even though it was dark she thought that she might recognize a thing or two.

She headed out along the main road and tried to remember which of the side streets would take her down to the gorge. It had been more than twenty years since she and Steven had stumbled upon the lonesome sandstone gorge and that dusty knoll where they shared a picnic lunch and watched tiny pinpoint men scale far-off mountains. They were like that then, not brave enough to summit a mountain, not exactly, but young enough to sit and look at one. Now she dreaded the thought of Steven in his chair, wincing as they crossed over unpaved roads and cursing her in his mind for taking the long way.

The town was larger than she remembered it, but prettier, too. Rows of tiny shops and mock cottages had sprung up along the thoroughfares. The streets themselves were mostly empty, illuminated by old fashioned street lamps, by the glimmer of a half-obscured crescent moon, and the steady clapping of her feet against the pavement reminded Carolyn how wonderfully far she was from home. What a little silence could do; how easily it could swallow up time and place. Yes, even people. Especially people.
Wandering down side roads and winding in and out of cul-de-sacs, she realized after a little while that she was lost. In the distance, some tiny glass-fronted place—a restaurant or maybe a bar—lit the sidewalk in spheres of green and gold. She decided to go in, just to ask for directions, really, but when she did, the bartender set down a menu. Carolyn wondered if it was fate. She believed in fate sometimes.

The place itself was darker than it had seemed and Carolyn found herself surrounded by sights and sounds which seemed familiar, but only vaguely so, like memories from childhood or perhaps from some past life, memories, she was sure, which were better left forgotten. There were the bleary-eyed older men, the vapid, giggling young girls, the deafening clang of too many people and things. But there was music as well and the music, although she couldn’t place it, the sound of music still made her smile. When the bartender returned, Carolyn ordered a white wine, whatever they had, the drier the better. She couldn’t remember the last time she had taken a drink and when it came the wine scorched her tongue. It was rotten; it was just like too-ripe pears and she suspected the bottle had been corked, but it went to her head in a way that helped her forget about the taste.

“Climber?”

The man glancing over at her was young and broadbacked, sitting two stools down, with a beard that looked as though it might have grown in by accident. Carolyn had seen him earlier, staring off at persons or places unknown, but his sudden attention still left her confused. “Excuse me?” she asked, trying her best to smile.

“The climbing, is that it? Are you here for the climbing?” Carolyn thought for a moment that he was being deliberately stupid, that he was mocking her age and her situation, and then, looking down at her plain khaki pants and practical shoes, it dawned on her that she was perhaps dressed for the part. Were there really female climbers? Of her age?

“Yes,” she said in a tone meant to be deadpan. “I can hardly get enough of climbing. Mountains, rocks, anything really.”

He nodded his agreement and then began to tell her his story in the way that people do to strangers in bars, with great attention to detail, with sweeping movements of his hands, with a voice so loud and booming that it made her blush. He had, Carolyn learned, read a magazine article about someone kayaking the Kali River and decided to circle the globe in search of the world’s fiercest rapids. He travelled with a friend, a rich friend who funded their expeditions, and the two of them had already visited four continents and more than a dozen states. He hated Tambor and loved Phuket. Once, while passing through Cyprus, he had broken his wrist and had it set by a local shaman. It healed in a matter of days. She marveled at the very idea of people like him, of just picking up and going somewhere. He seemed every bit as reckless and brave, every bit as childlike, as the men in her books.

“You know,” she said, straightening up a little, “I don’t think that there’s anything more glorious than standing on a mountaintop at daybreak. Just at daybreak, I mean. When the sun is coming up and the sky is light.” Carolyn wondered where she had heard that, probably in a movie. For a second, she was quite proud of herself and then, suddenly, an image: her sagging neck and sunken cheeks, the lines around her eyes, that time of night, a woman alone, some strange bar. What must he be thinking?

“Actually, my husband and I did a pre-dawn climb not far from here,” she said, emphasizing it—emphasizing her husband—as best she could. “Just a few days after we were married.”

“That’s cute,” he said in a way that left Carolyn embarrassed. “So this is part two then? Sort of a second honeymoon?”

“Well, no,” she told him, tracing the outline of her glass with one finger. It occurred to her that the man was waiting, that she would need to tell him something more, and then, as quickly as she realized it, the something appeared, as if it had willed itself into being, as if it had perhaps been waiting all this time for a chance to emerge. “My husband is dead.”

It was a horrible thing to say. Carolyn did not understand where the words had come from or why, having said them, she did not feel guilty or ashamed. Just this: she had said them. She wanted to take another drink, something stronger, maybe a whiskey sour. Yes, whiskey sounded good. It occurred to her that she could probably stay there and drink until the bar closed, until she could barely stand and had forgotten where she was. No one knew her there. What difference would it make?

Things became quiet for her.

She ordered another glass of wine and then, because she remembered that she hated the wine, a cognac. The man with the beard said something brief and meaningless about rivers and rainfall, but was otherwise silent. Carolyn understood. The alcohol made her breath feel heavy and allowed her to lose track of the space between herself and the man, between the man and the street, between the street here and the street she knew as a girl. She had been meaning to go back and visit. Her poor mother.

Finally, when she found herself gripped by a strange and uncomfortable ringing in her ears, Carolyn excused herself and exited to the restroom. She paid her tab, leaving the bartender an especially large tip. What a nice man to stand there and draw her a map on the back of a napkin. What a nice place. The world was smaller than it sometimes seemed. On her way out, she put a hand on the shoulder of the bearded man.

“I need to go now,” she told him. “But good luck with the river.”

He stared back at her blankly. Carolyn realized that she had interrupted, that he was already having a conversation with another man, this one clean-shaven but equally large. She thought it might be the friend he had told her about. Soon after she left, a brief chorus of laughter poured out of the bar, echoing off of the abandoned storefront across the street and Carolyn wondered if it was them, the two adventurers, laughing at the foolish old lady and her talk of mountaintops.

She looked at the map only briefly. The hotel, it turned out, was closer than she had realized, and on the way there she was able to locate the road that led down to the gorge. She followed it halfway down, until she could see what she thought was moonlight reflecting off of the water, and decided not to go any further. It was dreadful, just a haphazard slit carved into the earth. It was worse than dreadful; it was nothing; it was the absence of space. Carolyn hated this town now, how it was crowded and desolate all at once, how far away it seemed from every familiar signpost, every hint of civilization. She should have never left the hotel, she knew that now. She ought to have stayed with Steven, to have finished her book and taken her pill and fallen asleep to the sound of the television. It was, after all, her job, her only job, to be there and attend to him. And besides, he needed her so much.

Contributor's Note: William Barclay lives in Santa Monica and sometimes in Ridgecrest.

Monday, October 11, 2010

A Forest

Painting by Kelly Pankey
Acrylic on Canvas
11" x 14"


Contributor's Note: I have recently graduated from Cerro Coso and will be majoring in English at CSUB in the fall of 2010.

Monday, October 04, 2010

The Value of Choice

Essay by James Collins

Throughout mankind’s history, we have always looked for the answer to why men do what they do. Why do bad people do bad things and why do good people do good things? Or, more interestingly, why do good people do bad things and why do bad people do good things? Although modern psychology was not closely studied until the 19th century, the ethical search for the causality of human behavior dates back to the earliest civilizations of Egypt, Persia and Greece.

In literature, this enigma is often the driving force of the countless characters in countless stories. We find this protagonist thrust into that situation, and the suspense of the tale lies in how they will react and whether we will be able to predict what they will do. In “real life,” this conundrum often also drives our dramas of reality as well. How will our parents react to our recent engagement? How will our siblings deal with our father’s death?

In almost every instance, the choices characters make in literature, as well as the choices we make in reality, have immediate and longstanding consequences. The real question that ultimately matters in our judgments of any choice is not so much why, but was the choice justified? Could we celebrate the choices made if they are positive? Alternatively, can we understand and sympathize if the choices made were not in line with our own value set? Often, our society tends to “give a pass” to those who make poor decisions based on what the individuals have gone through in their lives and this, unfortunately, tends to relieve them of, if not true accountability, at least moral accountability.

This conflict of the reader’s judgment is very prevalent in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Indeed, the entire story is based upon two figures who, driven by their circumstance in life, seek to avoid accountability. Victor perpetually tries to ignore the existence of his creation, at first clapping and expressing “joy” (Shelley 63) simply to have the creature out of his sight. The creature, on the other hand, embraces “hellish rage and gnashing of teeth” (Shelley 125) towards “all mankind” (Shelley 126) due to his suffering at the hands of those he encounters. Yet, for both of these characters, the reader is expected to maintain a level of sympathy and understanding towards them, if not agreement.

We see further evidence of this tendency to expect sympathy and excuse for action in Mary Wollstonecraft’s From Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman in the main character, Jemima’s, depiction of her mother as one who was “seduced” (Wollstonecraft 197) rather than one who made the free decision to enter into a relationship with her father, leaving her “ruined” (Wollstonecraft 197). During this telling of the woeful tale, we are expected to accept Jemima for what she is as if she is beyond accountability since things were so hard for her from the beginning. Throughout the story, we see examples of less than desirable thoughts and decisions, such as stealing and fancying the murder of her sister in jealousy. Yet, in the end, it seems as if we are expected to feel as if all these things are excusable due to her harsh treatment.

In William Godwin’s Things as They Are, or The Adventures of Caleb Williams, even the antagonist of the story, Mr. Collins, excuses Caleb, stating “you did not make yourself” (Godwin 196). Again, we are presented with a character that is in a dire circumstance who seems to be there for every reason other than his own doing. Although Mr. Collins’ excuse of Caleb is more dismissive than sympathetic, it is excuse nonetheless. The character is a victim of his life and worthy of excuse.

This tendency of human nature is not restricted to the literary world. It seems that in all facets of life and popular culture, we tend to feel sorry for those in strife and think first of the turmoil they suffer and second, if at all, about why they are there. We feel bad for celebrities being chased by the paparazzi, for example, but don’t seem to give much thought to the fact that they are not suddenly cast, by surprise and against their will, into the public eye. They have spent years or decades trying to break into the upper echelon of Hollywood stardom. There is no mystery to what life is like for those that famous.

There are a number of articles and essays that carry this motif into reality. In one such article, “Peer Pressure Influences Gang Behavior” by Dale Greer, we follow a young underprivileged child named Hubert. It is stated as a given that he was cutting school because “his lack of material assets was so embarrassing” (Greer). By this logic, every child in his area should be cutting school, which, since there were obviously children at school, is untrue. Not long after, we find Hubert “committing crimes to provide for himself what his mother's income could not afford” (Greer). Certainly, Hubert couldn’t have been the only child in his neighborhood that had a poor mother. But, just as certainly, it is probably safe to assume that not every child in the area was a criminal.

There is no doubt that we are the sum of our parts. Certainly, many people in the world are forced into a life situation that is misfortunate. The refugees in Darfur, for example, either live in deplorable conditions in the refugee camp or face certain death by staying in their homelands. This is a much different situation than we see Victor, the creature, Jemima or Hubert face. Victor did not face certain demise if he did not toy with creating humanoid life. The creature would not have suffered more had he not killed Victor’s young brother. Jemima would not have starved had she not satisfied her “liquorish tooth” (Wollstonecraft 199). And, Hubert’s choices to commit crime so he wouldn’t be teased cannot be seen as one made in self preservation.

The moral dilemma being discussed here, when is it acceptable to commit egregious acts, does have a grey area, but one must tread lightly when considering whether to excuse one’s actions. A good example comes from a story used in psychology to study this very subject: moral dilemma. Dr. George Boeree published an article titled “Moral Development” outlining this topic. In the article, Boeree recounts a groundbreaking psychologist, Dr. Lawrence Kohlberg, using the following dilemma to test how subjects came to moral justification. It centers on a fictitious character named Heinz.

“His wife was dying of a disease that could be cured if he could get a certain medicine. When he asked the pharmacist, he was told that he could get the medicine, but only at a very high price- one that Heinz could not possibly afford. So the next evening, Heinz broke into the pharmacy and stole the drug to save his wife's life. Was Heinz right or wrong to steal the drug?” (Boeree)

Obviously, either answer would have positive and negative implications. If Heinz were to let his wife die, he would be not only heartbroken, but could even be considered negligent. However, if he steals, he has broken a key tenet of society. The argument isn’t so much which choice Heinz should make, but that Heinz must accept consequence for either choice and expect no excuse for his actions either way.

Such is the recurring theme in Frankenstein. We have a story that sprawls through numerous settings and even more numerous moral landscapes. With Victor, at every turn, he is confronted with his foul decision to bestow life to the creature. Instead of embracing his decision and fostering the goodwill of the creature, he instead allows “disgust” (Shelley 61) to drive his actions. Although this does not, by any means, excuse the creature’s future actions, it certainly lays the seed for what is to come. This failure cannot be excused. As Peg Tittle puts it in her article “Couples Should Need a License to Obtain the Privilege of Parenthood”, “’I created someone by accident’ should be just as horrific, and just as morally reprehensible, as ‘I killed someone by accident’” (Tittle). Although the context Ms. Tittle uses is one for procreation, the argument is the same and denies Victor the excuse that he could not have known what would happen upon animating the creature.

Just as surely, the creature can expect no sympathy for his actions, regardless of how he was treated in his life. Nothing can justify murder as a tool or a means to an end. Just as Paracelsus declares that “every field is ordered by its seed, and no seed by its field” (Paracelsus 204), the creature can seek no shelter of justification that the world had made him what he was. He could have chosen to exile himself, to continue to approach Victor in benevolence or any order of different paths other than vengeful murder.

It is clear that Victor and the creature do not value true accountability. They lament their situations at length throughout the novel and attempt to blame the other for their misfortunes, but neither of them ever seek to resolve the problem between them and, once it is too late and innocent blood had been shed, neither of them are willing to commit to the other any quarter which may end the ever escalating conflict between them. What they value is a victory over an adversary which is unattainable. They base this value upon a false notion that evil deeds perpetuate evil responses. They justify these actions to themselves at every step at the cost of those around them. In the end, not only does what they hold dear crumble around them, but those who are unwittingly associated with the situation pay with high cost– some with their lives.

What a reader should take from this writing, and those discussed throughout this essay, is that poor choices need to be dealt with head on. That which can be salvaged should be salvaged and that which is lost must be put behind oneself. What we see in Shelley’s Frankenstein is the manifestation of failure perpetuating failure and lack of accountability perpetuating further acts without accountability. We should learn from this writing that, although we are a sum of our parts and often victims of our circumstances, we are not ever without choice to do the right thing. To do otherwise or to believe contrary invites only more strife and indignity.

Works Cited

Bidinotto, Robert James. "A Lack of Morals Causes Criminal Behavior." Current Controversies: Crime. Ed. Paul A. Winters. San Diego:Greenhaven Press, 1998. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Cerro Coso Community College. n. pag. Web. 21 Apr. 2010

Boeree, George. "Moral Development." General Psychology. N.p., 2003. Web. 22 Apr 2010

Godwin, William, "Things as They Are, or The Adventures of Caleb Williams." Frankenstein (Contextual Documents). 2nd ed. Johanna Smith. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martins, 2000. Print.

Greer, Dale. "Peer Pressure Influences Gang Behavior." Opposing Viewpoints: Gangs. Ed. Laura K. Egendorf. San Diego: Greenhaven Press,2001. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Cerro Coso Community College. n. pag. Web. 21 Apr. 2010

Paracelsus, "On Creation." Frankenstein (Contextual Documents). Johanna Smith. Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martins, 2000. Print.

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 2nd ed. Ed. Johanna Smith Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martins, 2000. Print.

Tittle, Peg. "Couples Should Need a License to Obtain the Privilege of Parenthood." At Issue: Is Parenthood a Right or a Privilege?. Ed. Stefan Kiesbye. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Cerro Coso Community College. n. pag. Web. 22 Apr. 2010

Contributor's Note:I am a current student of Cerro Coso seeking a business degree. I am a US Air Force veteran and married father of two. I have a passion for writing and other creative expression. I wrote this piece during my freshman composition course and was encouraged to submit it to Met by my instructor, Gary Enns.